Quantcast
Channel: Cadence PCB Design Forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5525

Attaching Different Nets

$
0
0

 

Greetings,
 
    I have a design where I need to connect nets of different names. While I've done this many times, there's a hitch in this design. My boss is very uncomfortable with my present method of combing nets because it take an interaction with the board shop to make my intention clear. I create a different layer and I call it ADD_ETCH and it is laid across the gap to connect two different nets. This does not create a DRC in the layout but when implemented at the board facility it will create a DRC. Of course, when the board is in CAM, I will get a phone call (every time) to confirm my intent. I now have to come up with a method to have the connection show up when viewed with an external Gerber tool.
    The way I intend to approach this is wait until the design is almost near completion and change both nets to STATIC SOLID vice DYNAMIC SHAPE. I will then drop a polygon of appropriate dimensions across the gap(layers of concern are internal). I am presuming this will cause a DRC. My questions are:
 
1) Is this method reliable?
2) Changing from one shape type to another will not change the attributes of either shape, correct? For example, if I have a net named GND and the other is GND_PWR, the layers that these net names are assigned to retain their original names, correct?
 
This exercise is to be able to see a physical connection when viewed by a typical gerb tool. Any advice or clarification will be greatly appreciated. Referrals to specific literature would be useful also. Thanks.
 
Cheers,
Ron Scott CID+

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5525

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>